Drug Design & Library Analysis

From Concept to Screening-Ready Library. AI-Generated. Experimentally Validated.
De Novo Design Library Analytics Target Fishing

AI-generated scaffolds, proteome-scale target fishing, and DEL/HTS data mining --- delivered as a screening-ready library with validated binding hypotheses.

Why Drug Design & Library Analysis Is the Critical Foundation

Seed-stage biotechs lack medicinal chemistry bandwidth to explore millions of virtual compounds. Pharma teams pursuing undruggable targets need novel scaffolds that escape patent cliffs. We close this gap with AI-generated molecules, target fishing for phenotypic hits, and HTS/DEL data mining --- delivering screening-ready libraries that feed directly into virtual screening and lead optimization.

What Sets the Platform Apart

AI-Generated Scaffolds

Generative models invent novel chemotypes beyond existing patent space, filtered by synthesizability and ADMET rules.

Wet-Lab Validation Loop

Every AI-designed series advances directly into gene-to-protein production and biophysical confirmation.

Mechanism Discovery

Reverse docking and chemogenomic mapping reveal off-target liabilities and repurposing opportunities for known actives and natural products.

Technology Suite

De Novo Drug Design

Structure-Conditioned Generative AI for Novel Scaffold Invention

Diverse compound library centered around a single protein target for focused screening.

Key Features:

  • Structure-Conditioned Generative Models — Graph and diffusion-based AI generates 3D-aware scaffolds tailored to binding pocket pharmacophores, escaping template bias of traditional fragment growing.
  • Multi-Objective Optimization — Simultaneous optimization of affinity, selectivity, synthesizability (SA score), and ADMET properties via Pareto-frontier algorithms.
  • Patent & Chemical Space Navigation — Real-time novelty scoring against SureChEMBL and internal libraries ensures freedom-to-operate before synthesis commitment.

Ideal For: Seed-stage biotechs needing proprietary lead series without a medicinal chemistry department; programs targeting shallow or allosteric pockets where traditional SBVS returns no viable hits; fast-follower programs requiring scaffold hops around competitor patents.

What We Offer:
Virtual biotechs receive 50–200 novel scaffolds with predicted binding modes, synthetic routes, and ADMET risk profiles within weeks. Pharma teams access parallel-path design for backup series and fragment-to-lead opportunities.

Explore De Novo Design →

Reverse Docking & Target Fishing

Proteome-Scale Target Deconvolution for Phenotypic Hits

Single molecular scaffold engaging multiple protein targets illustrating polypharmacology.

Key Features:

  • Proteome-Scale Reverse Docking — Screening against 10,000+ human protein structures (AlphaFold-derived and experimental) to identify high-probability targets for small-molecule or natural product libraries.
  • Chemogenomic Signature Matching — ML classifiers compare compound profiles against annotated bioactivity matrices (ChEMBL, PubChem) to predict polypharmacology.
  • Pathway & Network Enrichment — Hit targets mapped onto KEGG/Reactome pathways to generate mechanistic hypotheses for phenotypic screening hits.

Ideal For: Natural product mechanism-of-action studies; drug repurposing campaigns; phenotypic screening hit deconvolution; safety pharmacology early warning.

What We Offer:
Seed-stage biotechs with a phenotypic hit but no target hypothesis receive a ranked target list with docking scores and pathway context. Pharma teams use target fishing to flag off-target risks early, reducing late-stage attrition.

HTS/DEL Library Screening Results Analysis

Statistical Hit Calling and SAR Extraction from Screening Campaigns

Curated collection of chemically diverse lead-like compounds for library screening.

Key Features:

  • Hit Calling & Enrichment Analysis — Statistical models (Z-score, B-score, Bayesian) separate true binders from assay artifacts in HTS and DEL datasets, accounting for compound promiscuity.
  • SAR/QSAR Model Building — Automated extraction of structure-activity relationships from screening campaigns, delivering predictive models for lead optimization prioritization.
  • Multi-Database Integration — Unified querying across ChEMBL, PubChem, and DrugBank to contextualize hits against known chemical space.

Ideal For: DEL screening follow-up campaigns; HTS triage for resource-constrained teams; data-driven scaffold prioritization.

What We Offer:
Clean, annotated hit lists with SAR trends and synthesis recommendations. Pharma teams integrate outputs with in-house ADMET data and crystallography results for comprehensive project dashboards.

Drug-related Database Query & Data Integration

Unified Data Architecture for Chemical, Biological, and Competitive Intelligence

Scaffold-hopping series exploring structural analogs around a common core motif.

Key Features:

  • Unified Data Architecture — Integration of commercial, public, and proprietary databases into a single queryable framework with standardized chemical identifiers.
  • Competitive Intelligence Mining — Automated patent and literature surveillance for target-class landscapes, clinical trial mappings, and competitor compound tracking.
  • Custom API & Dashboard Deployment — Client-specific data pipelines connecting internal ELN/LIMS data with external bioactivity and pharmacology databases.

Ideal For: Portfolio strategy teams; target validation groups requiring comprehensive chemical probe mapping; CMC teams tracking competitor formulation and salt-form data.

What We Offer:
A single source of truth for chemical, biological, and competitive data. Seed-stage biotechs gain pharma-grade data infrastructure without building internal IT. Pharma teams accelerate target assessment and IND-enabling documentation.

Platform Instrumentation

Core Instruments

Instrument Capability
NVIDIA DGX H100 Generative AI model training and billion-scale molecular library inference
Bruker AVANCE NEO 800 MHz NMR validation of AI-designed ligand conformations and binding modes
Thermo Scientific Q Exactive HF-X High-resolution MS for HTS hit confirmation and DEL decoding
PerkinElmer EnVision Nexus Multimode plate reading for biochemical and cell-based assay validation
Sartorius Octet SF8 High-throughput BLI for rapid affinity ranking of designed compounds
Waters ACQUITY UPLC H-Class Analytical purity and solubility profiling of synthesized AI scaffolds
Schrödinger LiveDesign Collaborative de novo design workspace with real-time ADMET scoring
Tecan Fluent 780 Automated liquid handling for parallel synthesis validation
GROMACS/AMBER HPC Cluster MD validation of AI-generated ligand-target complexes at scale

Standardized Workflow

Project Workflow

A standardized, milestone-driven execution system. From molecular concept to screening-ready library — managed by a single project team, tracked in real time, with AI embedded at every decision gate.

01 Target Review Week 1
02 AI Generation Week 1-2
03 Physical Filtering Week 2-3
04 Hit Prioritization Week 3-4
05 Validation Week 4-8

01 Target Review

  • Scope definition (de novo, reverse docking, or data analysis). Target structure assessment or compound library inventory.
  • Deliverable: Design strategy report.

02 AI Generation

  • De novo: AI scaffold generation (10,000+ virtual compounds).
  • Reverse docking: Proteome-wide target screening. Data analysis: HTS/DEL statistical modeling and hit calling.
  • Deliverable: Raw virtual library + target ranking / annotated dataset.

03 Physical Filtering

  • Docking-based affinity filtering. ADMET risk assessment (hERG, solubility, metabolic stability).
  • Synthesizability and patent novelty scoring.
  • Deliverable: Prioritized hit list (50–200 compounds) with risk profiles.

04 Hit Prioritization

  • SAR trend analysis and cluster visualization. Expert review and client consultation.
  • Selection of 5–20 compounds for experimental validation.
  • Deliverable: Final recommendation report + procurement/synthesis plan.

05 Validation

  • Gene-to-protein production for target confirmation.
  • Biophysical assay validation (SPR, ITC, thermal shift).
  • Co-crystal soaking for binding mode confirmation.
  • Deliverable: Validated hits + experimental data + final report.

Sample Requirements

  • De Novo Design: Target structure (PDB/AF model) or pharmacophore hypothesis; known actives (if any); target class and disease indication; IP constraints.
  • Reverse Docking: Compound structures (SDF/SMILES); known bioactivity context; desired target class or pathway focus.
  • Data Analysis: Raw screening data (plate maps, compound IDs, activity readouts); assay protocol; compound library metadata; prior hit criteria.

Standard Deliverables

  • AI-generated virtual library (SDF/SMILES) with predicted properties
  • Docking poses and affinity scores for prioritized hits
  • ADMET risk assessment report
  • SAR/QSAR model files and performance metrics
  • Target fishing report with ranked targets and pathway enrichment
  • Database integration dashboard (if applicable)
  • Final technical report with synthesis recommendations
  • Electronic data package (raw predictions, analysis scripts)

Frequently Asked Questions

Case Study

Case Study: VAE-Driven De Novo Design with Physics-Based Active Learning

Goal:

Validate whether a VAE embedded in nested active-learning cycles can deliver novel, synthesizable, and target-engaged hits across data-rich (CDK2) and data-scarce (KRAS G12D) targets.

Key Data:

  • Self-improving pipeline: Inner cycles filter for drug-likeness (QED > 0.6), synthetic accessibility (SA < 7.0), and novelty (Tanimoto < 0.6); outer cycles refine the VAE using physics-based docking scores.
  • CDK2 experimental hit: Nine synthesized candidates yielded eight active inhibitors (IC₅₀ < 50 µM), with one reaching 71 nM potency—escaping known patent scaffolds while retaining activity.
  • KRAS low-data proof: From only 73 known inhibitors, the workflow generated 23,488 high-scoring molecules; ABFE predicted four candidates with Kd < 15 µM, confirming sparse-space robustness.

Why it matters:

This independent study offers third-party validation that generative AI coupled with physics-based active learning resolves the de novo trilemma—engagement, synthesizability, and novelty. The confirmed experimental hit rate and low-data generalization, backed by open-source benchmarks, provide an authoritative reference for AI-driven library design and target fishing.

Case study figure

Figure 1. In vitro CDK2 activity of nine synthesized candidates from the VAE–active learning workflow. (Filella-Merce I.; et al. 2025)

Reference

Filella-Merce I, et al. Optimizing drug design by merging generative AI with a physics-based active learning framework. Commun Chem. 2025 Aug 8;8(1):238.

Ready to Design Your Next Library?
From molecular concept to screening-ready library --- without building a medicinal chemistry department.
Request Project Scoping →

Our technical team responds within 24 hours. All inquiries protected under NDA.